Optimizely
When a patient can’t complete a task on your website, the experience doesn’t end. It moves. Sixty-five percent of patients who fail to schedule an appointment online call the provider instead. That number sounds like a customer service story. It’s actually an operational and financial one, and most health systems haven’t connected those dots yet.
The 2026 SearchStax and MDRG national study of 1,000 U.S. adults is specific about what happens when digital experiences break down. Patients don’t stop needing care. They find another path, and that path almost always costs the organization more than the digital experience it just failed to deliver.
Read on below to learn more about the impact when healthcare website experiences fail, or you can dive into the full research findings by downloading the report.
Digital Friction Doesn’t Disappear — It Moves
This is the part that gets lost in how health systems typically talk about website performance. Bounce rates and session data capture what happens on the site. They don’t capture what happens next. A patient who couldn’t find a specialist online and called the contact center instead doesn’t show up as a conversion failure in most analytics dashboards. The system counts a phone call as a successful interaction. The cost of that interaction relative to a completed digital transaction never gets attributed back to the website experience that created it.
Digital friction doesn’t disappear when a patient gives up on the website. It shifts channels, and every channel shift carries a cost. Phone calls require staff. Longer handle times mean longer queues. Patients waiting on hold to schedule something they should have been able to do in two minutes online are having a worse experience than they would have had if the digital pathway had worked. The call center becomes the pressure valve for every broken moment in the digital journey, and it absorbs that pressure quietly enough that the connection to its source rarely gets made.
The Cost of a Single Failed Task
Consider what the math looks like at scale. A large health system with roughly a million weekly website visitors carrying even a modest task failure rate is pushing tens of thousands of patients into higher-cost channels every week. Scheduling failures are the most visible, but they’re not the only ones. Patients who can’t find a new primary care doctor online, patients who can’t verify insurance coverage, patients who can’t locate the right specialist for their condition, all of them represent a task that failed and a cost that materialized somewhere else in the organization.
The report surfaces a particularly sharp data point around new patient acquisition. When patients can’t find a new primary care doctor online, 24% give up entirely. Not temporarily. They don’t call. They don’t try again later. They abandon the search and the organization loses a potential patient who never entered the system at all. Unlike other task failures where the patient shifts to a phone call, this one produces nothing. No visit. No downstream referral. No relationship of any kind.
That 24% represents digital leakage. Patients falling completely out of the funnel at the moment they were trying to start a relationship with the system. The call center doesn’t ring and the revenue never materializes. The organization doesn’t see it because there’s nothing to measure. A person who never became a patient leaves no trace.
The Revenue Impact Most Teams Miss
Healthcare revenue doesn’t work like most industries. A single new patient relationship represents more than one appointment. It represents a primary care visit that leads to a referral that leads to a specialist that leads to a procedure. Losing a patient at the digital front door doesn’t cost the organization one scheduling transaction. It costs the downstream value of everything that relationship would have generated.
Most digital teams don’t have visibility into that number. The disconnect between website performance data and revenue cycle data inside most health systems means the financial consequence of digital failure is chronically underreported. What leadership sees is call center volume and handle time. What they don’t see is the website experience that drove that volume, or the patients who didn’t call at all and simply moved on.
Making that connection visible is one of the most important things a digital experience leader can do right now. The argument for investing in better digital pathways is not a UX argument; it’s a cost structure argument and a patient acquisition argument, and it lands differently with finance and operations than any conversation about user experience ever will.
Why Fixing This Isn’t Just a UX Problem
The instinct in most organizations is to treat website problems as website problems. A broken search experience gets routed to the digital team. A scheduling flow that confuses patients gets added to a backlog. These are solved as isolated UX issues rather than as the operational and revenue problems they actually are.
The research makes the business case for a different framing. When 65% of patients who can’t schedule online pick up the phone, that’s a staffing and cost issue. When 24% of patients looking for a new primary care doctor give up entirely, that’s a patient acquisition issue. When call center volume spikes because digital pathways aren’t completing the jobs patients need done, that’s an operational efficiency issue. The website is the origin point for all of it, and it should be treated accordingly in how organizations prioritize and fund digital investment.
Designing for Completion, Not Just Access
Most health system websites were designed to provide access to information. That’s a different goal than helping patients complete tasks, and the distinction matters more than it might seem. A website can be full of accurate, relevant content and still fail patients who are trying to schedule an appointment, find a provider or verify their coverage. Access and completion are not the same thing.
Designing for completion means measuring differently. Task completion rates, drop-off points within scheduling flows, zero-result search queries and the volume of calls that originate from website sessions are all signals that connect digital experience to operational impact. Most organizations aren’t measuring these things systematically, which is part of why the conversation about digital investment stays at the surface level.
The practical priorities follow from the measurement. Scheduling pathways need to be fast, clear and completable without a phone call as a fallback. Search needs to surface providers and services in a way that leads somewhere actionable. Content needs to answer the questions patients actually have rather than the questions the organization anticipated they might have.
Every task a patient completes online is a call the contact center doesn’t receive. Every patient who finds the right provider without friction is a relationship that starts on the right terms. At the scale health systems operate, getting this right isn’t a digital nicety. It’s an operational imperative.
See How Digital Experience Impacts Both Patient Access and Operational Efficiency.
Download the 2026 “Win or Lose Patients at the Digital Front Door” report from SearchStax and MDRG.
Chris Pace is VP, Digital Experience Strategy at SearchStax, where he helps enterprises modernize digital access through smarter site search and self-service. He brings 15+ years of marketing leadership focused on connecting people to valuable digital experiences.
